Shulou(Shulou.com)06/01 Report--

This article will explain in detail what are the stable and easy-to-use Linux desktop systems. The editor thinks it is very practical, so I share it with you for reference. I hope you can get something after reading this article.

With the admirable advantages of all three operating systems on the Linux desktop, I have had the opportunity to understand how they work, and now provide some unbiased views for users who use and program on these three platforms. Background: I own several Macintosh computers, including various models, and I clearly remember the conversion from OS9 to OS X. I have used a range of MicroSoft products from DOS to Windows XP, and have used a variety of operating systems from IBM and NetWare.

Now in my daily work, I use SUSE SLES and Pro, RHEL, Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu on servers and workstations. Each operating system has its own programming system, and OS is more like a Linux desktop system than Windows. Windows and linux have a completely different programming structure than OS. Windows relies more on its graphical interface. Windows XP uses the NT kernel to manage the file system and communicate with the graphical interface. OS X and Linux use completely different kernel extensions and independent programs to run under the Shell of the user interface. UNIX shell runs within what kernel developers call userland. UNIX and Linux developers believe that their development approach is better than that of Windows,Windows developers who believe that Windows provides faster interface extensions and faster program development. Objectively, each has its own advantages.

Macintosh as a personal application, I use Mac computers to develop graphics, audio products and development websites. I've never restarted my computer at work, and it allows me to use InterNet apps in ways I've never used before in Unix. Windows XP I remember that I had been using XP for three months without restarting it. XP is more secure because of its firewall, and three months later, the system becomes more sluggish, making it difficult to maintain common operations such as disk defragmentation, deleting files, and checking the registry. I prefer XP to the previous Windows operating system. For the comparison of the three operating systems, I synthesized the survey, analysis report and personal experience. I have a preference for free software, but I will make sure that this comparison is objective. Ubuntu Ubuntu is a good replacement for Linux desktops and Unix for developers and administrators. Compared with SUSE's 11.4% of the Linux desktop market, Ubuntu has 25% of the market share, so this comparison uses it to represent Linux desktop systems. Like all Linux systems, Ubuntu has some limitations. It lacks some applications commonly used in Windows. So Ubuntu is only a medium-level Linux desktop system. When you use Linux to develop Web Service, you will find that it has many benefits and does not require high hardware configuration and memory overhead. I can use the memory of 512MB to achieve the effect of 1GMB on other operating systems. In addition, Ubuntu has a good desktop and can be suitable for end-users and business users, and home users will find it a stable and easy-to-use operating system. Windows XP Xp provides a suitable operating system to bring together a large number of independent software developers who use Win32API to develop their own commercial software.

XP is pre-installed in the products of everyone using pc except Apple. Relatively high retail prices and low OEM prices make it appear on a large number of PC. Since the release of XP, Microsoft has provided a series of security patches and Service Pack. As a development platform, Windows XP is not as popular as Linux, Macintosh and UNIX. Microsoft's development tools can only run on the Windows platform and do not provide compatibility with other platforms. But XP users are not bothered by this. Windows's software installation is based on the assumption that most people know how to use Windows systems, thus creating a gap between them and other systems. However, a large number of Microsoft certified systems engineers can solve all possible problems, and they do not feel the need to switch to other systems. Apart from the "know the facts" campaign, cost savings make little sense for Microsoft. Macintosh OS X Macintosh OS X can only run on limited hardware, but Apple has implemented a strong and stable system environment. Apple's high-end models, such as the Power Mac G5, provide excellent performance for graphics and multimedia users. Powerbook is also popular among developers and writers.

Apple remains a major source of innovation in the PC industry. Many users are willing to pay for Apple's performance and innovation. Although Apple has been criticized for its lack of software on its computer, things have improved a lot. OS X includes Adobe's series of software and Microsoft's efficiency suite, as well as some free software and multi-media players. Among intermediate computer users, Apple's Macintosh is not as popular as the V. Only users who can really afford it are full of love for Macintosh. Take a closer look at Macintosh OS X and Microsoft Windows XP are more widely used than Linux in the field of education. The market share of desktop computers will not change unless hardware vendors and independent software vendors do more for Linux.

However, for both manufacturers, there are considerable risks in making such efforts. Because the Linux desktop community tends to use free software, software vendors may not be able to recover the cost of research and development. In addition, the short update cycle of the Linux desktop system is also one of the reasons why manufacturers are deterred. Even if these are resolved, manufacturers are not sure whether Linux desktops will evolve to replace Windows desktops. But the software products offered by Adobe and Intuit are likely to prompt Linux to take this step forward. Some companies tried this risk on Unix and failed miserably. So Windows will continue to dominate the desktop for the time being, Macintosh will continue to provide services to connoisseurs, and Ubuntu will continue to play the role of intermediate desktop and developer platform.

About "stable and easy-to-use Linux desktop systems" this article is shared here, I hope the above content can be of some help to you, so that you can learn more knowledge, if you think the article is good, please share it out for more people to see.

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.