Shulou(Shulou.com)06/03 Report--

In this issue, the editor will bring you about the difference between activemq and rabbitmq. The article is rich in content and analyzes and narrates it from a professional point of view. I hope you can get something after reading this article.

The differences between activemq and rabbitmq are: 1. Activemq is an established message queue, which is written in Java language and supports JMS best with multi-thread concurrency. 2. Rabbitmq is the leading implementation of AMQP protocol and supports multiple scenarios. Taobao's MySQL cluster is used for communication.

The differences between activemq and rabbitmq are:

1 、 ActiveMQ/ApolloMQ

Pros: established message queues, written in Java. The best support for JMS, the use of multi-thread concurrency, resource consumption is relatively large. If your main language is Java, you can focus on it.

Disadvantages: due to a long history, a lot of historical burden, the version update is very slow. The cluster mode needs to rely on Zookeeper implementation. The product of the latest architecture is named Apollo, known as the next generation ActiveMQ, and there are few cases at present.

2 、 RabbitMQ

Advantages: rich ecology, a large number of users, there are a lot of people in front of the pit. The leading implementation of the AMQP protocol supports multiple scenarios. Taobao's MySQL cluster uses it for communication, and the communication components of OpenStack open source cloud platform are the first to be used in the financial industry.

Cons: do you have to live with Hold in Erlang code? Although Erlang is naturally clustered, RabbitMQ is not particularly handy in terms of high availability, so don't trust advertising.

Supplement: RocketMQ/Kafka

Advantages: designed for mass messaging, advocate the use of pull mode, natural cluster, HA, load balancer support. The same sentence is suitable to see if you have such a large quantity.

Disadvantages: you can't have both fish and bear's paw, give up some of the flexibility of message middleware, and use a narrow scenario. You need to pay attention to whether your business model fits, otherwise it is awkward to use shanzhai in disguise. In addition, RocketMQ does not have clients available under. Net. RocketMQ is famous, but there are not many users and the ecology is relatively small. After all, there are not many companies that can reach this volume of news, and you can also directly buy Aliyun's message service. Kafka is ecologically sound, and its code is written in Scala, which is less reliable than RocketMQ.

The above is the difference between activemq and rabbitmq shared by the editor. If you happen to have similar doubts, you might as well refer to the above analysis to understand. If you want to know more about it, you are welcome to follow the industry information channel.

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.