Shulou(Shulou.com)11/24 Report--

Thanks to CTOnews.com netizens for the clues of crucian carp snow fox to deliver! CTOnews.com June 7, Stack Overflow is a well-known software developer forum run by Stack Exchange, where users can ask and answer a variety of programming questions. Recently, some volunteer moderators of the site launched a strike to protest the company's new AI content policy, which stipulates that all content generated by AI can be posted on the site and users cannot be banned because of AI content. Moderators said they were worried that this would lead to a flood of misinformation and damage to the quality and credibility of the site.

Moderators wrote in an open letter: "Stack Overflow has ordered that any censorship of AI-generated content be prohibited." Incorrect information ('hallucinations') and unbridled plagiarism are allowed by default on the Stack Exchange network. This poses a major threat to the integrity and credibility of the platform and its content. In protest against this and other recent and upcoming policy and platform changes, we decided to immediately launch a full moderator strike on the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange networks. "

The policy, implemented at the end of May, requires moderators to stop censoring content just because it is generated by AI. However, moderators believe that if the content generated by AI is not properly managed, the quality and accuracy of information on Stack Exchange sites will decline rapidly.

The moderators published an article on Meta Stack Exchange to further explain their demands. The article wrote, "AI chatbots are like parrots. For example, ChatGPT doesn't understand the answers it gives you; it just restates sentences that seem reasonable based on given prompts and the information it can access." It cannot verify whether the answer it provides to you is accurate. ChatGPT is not a writer, a programmer, a scientist, a physicist, or any other kind of expert on which our website depends. When asked, it only pieced together the words according to the training it received. It doesn't understand what it's talking about. "

"this allows users to retell ChatGPT's answers without understanding what they are saying, which runs counter to our site's goal of becoming a library of high-quality Q & A content," the article said.

Moderators say another problem is the company's lack of transparency in formulating this policy. In December, they wrote, the site implemented a temporary policy banning all ChatGPT because it was "generally inaccurate" and violated the site's citation requirements. This policy was supported by volunteer moderators and Stack Exchange employees, and resulted in many posts being deleted and users banned.

However, on May 29, moderators wrote that the company had privately implemented a new policy requiring "to immediately stop blocking users for AI-generated content, and to stop managing AI-generated content for that reason alone." The next day, a slightly different version of the policy was publicly released, without a language requiring moderators to stop restricting all AI content.

"the new policy overturns the consensus already reached in the community, does not discuss with any community members, misleads the moderator and the public, and is based on baseless claims based on uncensored and uncensored data analysis," the Meta Stack Exchange article wrote.

Moderators also asked the company to improve the site's non-AI-related issues. "the strike is also largely about a behavior model recently demonstrated by Stack Exchange," the article wrote. "the company once again ignored the needs and consensus of the community and focused on business transformation at the expense of its own community managers." One example they cite is the site's chat feature, which they say is out of date but has been ignored for years.

CTONews.com noted that the strike was the first major move against the influx of AI-generated content into online sites, and moderators on other forums had similar concerns. Some moderators on Reddit are ready for a large number of posts with error messages generated by AI. A Reddit moderator, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Motherboard,Reddit that the problem with ChatGPT-driven robots was "quite serious" and that hundreds of accounts had been manually deleted from the site because Reddit's automated system could not cope with AI-generated content.

Moderators want the company to withdraw and revise its AI policy to resolve inconsistencies between public and private versions and apologize for it. "A small number of moderators on the Stack Overflow network (11%) have stopped participating in some activities, including managing content," Philippe Beaudette, vice president of the Stack Overflow community, told Motherboard in a statement. "the main reason for this action is dissatisfaction with our position on AI-generated content detection tools. Stack Overflow conducted an analysis and found that ChatGPT testers previously used by moderators had an alarmingly high false positive rate." The moderators wrote in the article that they knew there was a problem with the testing tool. "We insist on our decision to ask the moderator to stop using the previous tool," Beaudette continued. "We believe we will find a way forward. We regret that the situation has come to this, and the community management team is assessing the current situation while trying to stabilize the situation in the short term."

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.