Shulou(Shulou.com)11/24 Report--

Original title: "3 dead and 5 injured, US shooting case paralyzes Chinese students, this university actually exposes itself to writing eulogy with ChatGPT!"

A shooting at a US state university left 3 dead and 5 injured. While many people were grieving, a university wrote an article mourning the dead in ChatGPT.

Now, ChatGPT has been used by many people to write papers, write homework, write code, but recently, two presidents of a university in the United States, even lazy cancer attack, using ChatGPT to write eulogy?

Three people were killed and five injured in a campus shooting at Michigan State University on Feb. 13.

Among them, two Chinese students were injured.

John Hao, 20, was shot in the back, severing his spinal cord and severely damaging his lungs, causing John to be paralyzed from the chest down.

(Source: BridgeMichigan) At a time when many people are grieving and mourning the tragic event, a university letter of condolence is shocking and infuriating.

They wrote a letter of condolence in ChatGPT in response, only 297 words.

This practice of "using ChatGPT on the blade" instantly aroused people's anger, and angry doubts immediately flooded the school.

Just last week, Anthony Dwayne McRae, 43, shot dead three students at Michigan State University before committing suicide.

Sadly, the dead were only students in their 20s.

Anthony terrorized students on campus for four hours, injuring five others in addition to three dead.

Alexandria Verner, Brian Fraser , Arielle Diamond (Source: Daily Mail) The first victim Alexandria Verner was a junior biology and anthropology major at Michigan State University. She took part in many sports competitions in high school and was recognized by her classmates as a great athlete.

The second victim, Brian Fraser, was a sophomore and president of the Phi Delta Theta fraternity chapter at Michigan State University.

The chapter said in a statement Tuesday:

Brian is our leader and we love him. He cares deeply about his brother and family, Michigan State and fraternities. Brian will be greatly missed and deeply mourned.

Arielle Diamond, 19, was the third victim and hopes to one day become a pediatrician.

As everyone mourns for their fallen comrades, an e-mail from Vanderbilt University is a surprise.

The email says--

The recent shooting in Michigan is a tragic warning. It reminds people of the importance of caring for one another, especially in the context of creating an inclusive environment.

As members of the Peabody campus community, we must reflect on the impact of this event, and faculty and students should do their best to take steps to ensure a safe and inclusive environment for all. Learn from mistakes and work together to build a stronger, more inclusive community.

Original email: t.e2ma.net/ message / ul 182h/ m74zooz This line of words instantly ignited people's anger and simply destroyed humanity!

Laith Kayat, a Michigan senior, said:

Asking a robot to write about community solidarity is a sick, twisted irony, because you don't even bother to reflect. (Managers) care only about what people think and the system that allows them to save face.

Samuel Lu, a sophomore, said,"When I know that the sender didn't even take the time to convey his true thoughts and feelings, it's really hard to read through it." In times of tragedy like these, we need more humanity, not less."

One of the authors, Nicole Joseph, a vice dean at Peabody, quickly issued an apology, saying it was a mistake to use AI tools to comment on the tragedy.

Nicole Joseph, currently suspended (Source: Daily Mail) Nicole Joseph said in an email,"At this sad time, we are using ChatGPT to respond, which contradicts the values of Peabody College." The open source AI platform is a novel technology, and we are all still learning about its capabilities and limitations."

Camilla P. Benbow, dean of the Peabody School of Education, said in a subsequent statement that since the e-mail caused an uproar, two deans who signed the e-mail-Nicole Joseph and Hasina Mohyuddin-have been suspended and that Peabody is conducting an internal "review" of the incident.

Benbow claimed that the email had not been written and sent "following Peabody's normal processes" and that other executives had no prior knowledge of the email.

Benbow said she was "deeply saddened by the loss of life at Michigan State" and "deeply disturbed that our school has not shown empathy at this time of grief."

Benbow said she was "deeply saddened by the loss of life at Michigan State" and "deeply disturbed that our school has not shown empathy at this time of grief."

Hasina Mohyuddin has also been suspended (Source: Daily Mail) Can AI reflect on behalf of humans? A shooting case with 3 deaths and 5 injuries stems from loopholes in the legal system and management. This bloody lesson deserves deep and painful reflection by all schools.

As a result, what should have been human thinking and human mourning has been replaced by an emotionless, cliché article written by AI?

This kind of behavior reflects the carelessness, indifference and callousness of school administrators.

McRae killed three people, wounded five others, and shot himself over a four-hour period. Even if there was a slight sadness about the student casualties, the administrator would not have chosen ChatGPT to generate a fake article.

Although generative AI has become more and more powerful, and the scenarios used are more and more common, it is foolish and cruel to replace it with AI when it is necessary to show humanity.

A few days ago, ChatGPT version of Bing was "lobotomized" and has since become emotionless, like a cold machine.

Human beings, who should have brain lobes and emotions, should never become more indifferent than AI.

We need real human empathy, not robots, to take us to a better future.

Who is responsible for AI chatbots? This isn't the first time ChatGPT has caused conflict in academia.

Large language models do not understand what they generate and are not conscious machines.

But its ability to output text that looks uniquely human has many colleges worried that their students will use the tool to write essays and cheat.

Some time ago, some schools announced that they had completely banned ChatGPT, but some college teachers are cautiously incorporating AI into their curricula.

In fact, ChatGPT has been integrated into many people's daily lives. When it comes to the edge of the law, who is responsible?

On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether algorithmic advice was exempt from legal liability. This issue could have a significant impact on tools like ChatGPT or new versions of Bing.

In oral arguments, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch reflected on what the latest algorithmic innovations sweeping the tech world mean: generative artificial intelligence that can advise people.

These include chatbots like ChatGPT and Microsoft's new Bing.

A question raised in Gonzales v. Google debate is whether platforms like Youtube, TikTok or Google Search can be held accountable for targeted recommendations provided by their algorithms.

The case was filed by relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old American woman.

Gonzalez was one of 130 people killed when three ISIS terrorists opened fire on a group of diners in Paris in November 2015.

Gonzalez's relatives claim YouTube, which owns Google, deliberately allowed ISIS to post radical videos on the platform, inciting violence and recruiting potential supporters.

In addition to allowing videos to be posted, the complaint alleges that Google recommends ISIS videos to users through its recommendation algorithm.

The case boils down to algorithmic recommendation, which is whether or not it is protected by Section 230 when YouTube suggests what you should watch next, or ChatGPT tells you where to go on vacation.

This provision is part of the Communications Regulation Act of 1996. To make it clear, Internet companies are not liable for content posted by third parties or users on their platforms.

So, is the AI chatbot under the protection of 230?

Judge Gorsuch said,"AI is now raising arguments that go beyond extracting, selecting, analyzing, or digesting content." These items are not protected. If we assume that this is true, then the question becomes, how do we deal with recommendation algorithms?"

It can be seen that Gorsuch believes that generative AI does not meet the protection conditions stipulated in Article 230.

This issue could have a major impact on companies such as Google and Microsoft.

Because ChatGPT's popularity has led many companies to see future opportunities, they are trying to integrate "conversational chatbot recommendations" into their own search engines.

The Internet has changed dramatically since Article 230 was introduced in 1996. Lawmakers have grappled over the past few years with the question of how to amend the provisions of the law.

Social media has long been under fire for testing the boundaries of the law.

It seems that integrating chatbots such as ChatGPT recommendations into search engines will undoubtedly raise more liability issues.

Who will be responsible then?

References:

https://futurism.com/the-byte/university-apologizes-chatgpt-email-mass-shooting

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11776279/Vanderbilt-apologizes-using-ChatGPT-write-email-students-MSU-mass-shooting.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/peabody-college-apologized-chatgpt-condolence-email-michigan-state-shooting-2023-2

https://www.bridgemi.com/talent-education/michigan-state-shooting-victim-john-hao-china-paralyzed-bullet

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/gorsuch-chatgpt-section-230

https://www.zdnet.com/article/facebooks-mark-zuckerberg-tells-congress-how-to-tweak-section-230/

This article comes from Weixin Official Accounts: Xinzhiyuan (ID: AI_era)

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.