Shulou(Shulou.com)11/24 Report--

CTOnews.com, November 10, 2008, the Ministry of Science and Technology and other eight departments recently issued a "work plan for carrying out the pilot reform of the evaluation of scientific and technological talents" (hereinafter referred to as "the program"), and formulated a pilot work plan for carrying out the reform of the evaluation of scientific and technological talents in view of the outstanding problems such as the lack of a new standard, the innovation of evaluation methods, the reform of resource allocation evaluation, and the construction of the evaluation system of employing units.

The "plan" points out that pilot units and localities choose scientific research institutes, institutions of higher learning or affiliated institutions of higher learning that have national scientific and technological innovation bases, undertake many national scientific and technological tasks, have better demonstration effects, and have a better basis for talent evaluation, as well as scientific research institutes in agriculture, health, water conservancy, industry, and information technology, which have a large number of scientific research personnel, to carry out the pilot work of scientific and technological personnel evaluation and reform. At the same time, some provinces and cities where scientific research institutions are relatively concentrated, undertake more national tasks and have a good foundation are selected to carry out comprehensive pilot work on the evaluation and reform of scientific and technological talents. The pilot unit shall have the independent legal personality. The pilot period is 2 years (from the date of approval of the pilot implementation plan).

CTOnews.com learned that the "plan" requires that the pilot task insist on having both ability and political integrity, and regard moral character as the primary content of the evaluation of scientific and technological talents. On the basis of strengthening the evaluation of scientific spirit and academic morality of scientific and technological talents, and according to the evaluation of talents who undertake the major tasks of the country, as well as basic research, applied research and technology development, and social public welfare research. This paper puts forward pilot tasks from the aspects of constructing evaluation indicators in line with the characteristics of scientific research activities, innovative evaluation methods, and improving the internal system construction of employers, so as to promote a more perfect talent evaluation system and form effective practices that can be operated, replicated and popularized.

(1) Evaluation of talents who undertake the major tasks of tackling key national problems

1. We will prominently support the demand orientation of major national strategies, establish evaluation indicators that reflect the actual contribution and innovative value of supporting national security, breaking through key core technologies, and solving major problems in economic and social development, and focus on evaluating the completion of major national scientific research tasks.

two。 We will improve the user-oriented evaluation of scientific research tasks and fully listen to the opinions of the entrusting party of the task and the user of the achievement. Pay attention to the combination of individual evaluation and team evaluation.

3. Scientific research personnel who undertake and make important contributions to the major tasks of tackling key problems in the country and the construction of major national scientific and technological infrastructure will be given more preferential support in terms of post recruitment, professional title evaluation, performance evaluation, and so on.

(2) Evaluation of talents in basic research

1. Carry out the evaluation of representative works marked by original achievements and high-quality papers, and establish talent evaluation indicators that reflect major original contributions, national strategic needs, discipline characteristics, academic influence and research ability. Get rid of the quantitative tendency of "only papers", do not take the number of papers, the level of influence factors and other relevant indicators as quantitative assessment indicators, and encourage researchers to publish more high-quality papers in domestic sci-tech journals.

two。 According to the characteristics of the discipline and the nature of the task, the evaluation cycle is determined scientifically, and efforts are made to explore the assessment mechanism of low frequency and long period.

3. Explore the establishment of peer evaluation responsibility mechanism, establish relevant systems in expert selection, management and credit records, standardize peer evaluation methods and procedures, evaluation feedback and other behaviors. Explore the introduction of academic groups and other third-party evaluation, international peer evaluation and so on.

4. We will establish and improve relevant systems such as post employment, professional title evaluation and performance evaluation that reflect the characteristics of basic research talent evaluation, and increase tilt support for basic researchers who have made major scientific discoveries and made original breakthroughs.

5. To explore the mechanism by which front-line scientists recommend outstanding young scientific and technological talents to hold important scientific research posts and undertake "from 0 to 1" basic research tasks.

(3) Evaluation of talents in applied research and technology development

1. Guided by technological breakthroughs and industrial contributions, we will focus on evaluating representative achievements such as technical standards, technological solutions, high-quality patents, transformation and industrialization of achievements, and deep integration of industry, university and research. We will establish evaluation indicators that reflect industry-university-research and team cooperation, technological innovation and integration capabilities, market value and application effectiveness of achievements, and contributions to economic and social development. Whether or not to publish a paper, the number of patents obtained and the number of national project funds applied for shall not be taken as the main evaluation indicators.

two。 Explore the construction of experts focus on the evaluation of the technical level, the market evaluation of industrial value, the market, users, the third party in-depth participation of the evaluation method.

3. Scientific research personnel who undertake and contribute to national scientific research tasks, especially those who undertake and contribute to national scientific research tasks, such as the tasks of tackling key scientific research problems and the construction of national major scientific and technological infrastructure, should be inclined in terms of the weight of performance evaluation to guide outstanding scientific research personnel to join the national scientific and technological tasks.

4. We will explore the establishment of posts for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, focus on evaluating the effectiveness of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and establish a high-level and professional talent team for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.

(4) Evaluation of talents in social welfare research

1. Highlight the characteristics of the industry and posts, and focus on evaluating the ability and effectiveness of the development and services of common key technologies, such as serving public management, dealing with emergencies, ensuring people's livelihood and social security, etc., explore the establishment of evaluation indicators that reflect the application benefits of achievements, the satisfaction of science and technology services and social benefits, and guide researchers to write their papers on the land of the motherland. Highlight the long-term contributions of researchers in difficult and remote areas, high-risk posts, grass-roots frontlines and researchers engaged in basic scientific research work. No evaluation indicators of rigid economic benefits shall be established.

two。 Improve the social evaluation methods, fully listen to the opinions of industry users and service objects, and pay attention to the government and social evaluation. The reasonable evaluation cycle is determined according to different types of scientific research and service activities.

3. Scientific research personnel who undertake and support national scientific research tasks and make contributions to the application of the achievements are skewed in the aspects of post employment, professional title evaluation and performance evaluation, so as to guide excellent scientific researchers to join the national public welfare undertakings.

(5) Comprehensive pilot task of evaluation and reform of local scientific and technological talents

The pilot local government should focus on the task of scientific and technological innovation and the construction of talent team in their own region, and take "breaking the four only" and "setting up new standards" as breakthroughs, organize and guide regional superior scientific research institutions and new R & D institutions to deepen the reform of classified evaluation of scientific and technological talents, boldly innovate the mechanism of discovering, training, using and encouraging talents, give full play to the effect of policy integration, and promote the integrated allocation of talents, projects, bases and funds. Effectively stimulate the vitality of scientific and technological talents and explore the formation of replicable regional experience.

List of pilot units and localities for carrying out the evaluation and reform of scientific and technological talents: scientific research institutes (a total of 12):

Shanghai Institute of Microsystems and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Research Institute, Nanjing Water Conservancy Research Institute, Agricultural Resources and Agricultural regionalization Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Genome Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Electronic Fifth Research Institute of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and Peking Union Medical College of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Institutions of higher learning or affiliated institutions of higher learning (a total of 9):

Tsinghua University, Peking University, Zhejiang University, Beijing University of posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an University of Electronic Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Jiangnan University, West China Clinical College of Sichuan University, Harbin University of Technology.

Places (6 in total):

Shanghai, Shandong, Hubei, Sichuan, Shenzhen, Nanjing.

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.