Shulou(Shulou.com)06/02 Report--

This article mainly introduces what are the mistakes of Lambda in Python. It is very detailed and has a certain reference value. Friends who are interested must finish it!

Lambda, also known as the lambda function, is an anonymous function that can accept any number of parameters, but only one expression. Their declarations are represented by the lambda keyword. The basic syntax is as follows.

Lambda arguments: expression

Lambda is best suited for places where small features are needed and used only once. A common use of lambda is to set it as a key parameter in the built-in sorted () function. This is an example.

> students = [('Mike',' Mises, 15), ('Mary',' Mises, 14), ('David',' Mises, 16)] > sorted (students, key=lambda x: X [2]) [('Mary',' Falls, 14), ('Mike',' Mises, 15), ('David',' Mises, 16)] # The students are sorted by age

Many tutorials do a good job of explaining what lambda is and where lambda can be used, so there is no good reason to repeat a lot of it here.

Instead, the purpose of this article is to show you the most common misuses of lambda so that you may use them correctly when using lambda in situations other than those listed below.

1. Reinvent the wheel

The first misuse of lambdas is to ignore existing built-in functions.

Let's still take the sorted () function as an example. Suppose we have a list of strings and we want to sort them using their length.

Of course, the lambda function lambda x:len (x) works, but how about using the built-in len () function directly?

> pets = ['dog',' turtle', 'bird',' fish', 'kitty'] > sorted (pets, key=lambda x: len (x)) [' dog', 'bird',' fish', 'kitty',' turtle'] # The built-in len () function > > sorted (pets, key=len) ['dog',' bird', 'fish',' kitty', 'turtle']

This is another example that involves using the max () function.

> number_tuples = [(4,5,7), (3,1,2), (9,4,1)] > > sorted (number_tuples, key=lambda x: max (x)) [(3,1,2), (4,5,7), (9,4,1)] # The built-in max () function > > sorted (number_tuples, key=max) [(3,1,2), (4,5,7), (9,4,1)]

Good practice 1: think about built-in functions before writing your own Lambda.

two。 Assign it to a variable

In some tutorials (including some of my tutorials), I've seen how to assign lambdas to variables, but it mainly shows beginners that lambdas is essentially a function.

However, some beginners may have taken it as a good habit and thought that lambda is just a convenient way to declare short functions. The following code snippet shows you this abuse.

> divide_two_numbers = lambda x, y: X / y > divide_two_numbers (4,5) 0.8

Why should this be avoided? If you remember what was mentioned above, lambda should only be used once, so there is no reason to assign lambda to variables.

If you do need to use the relevant functionality, you should use the def keyword to declare a regular function, as shown below.

If you don't think the two lines of code that use this simple feature are cool, we can rewrite it as one line: defdivid_two_numbers_fun (xmemy): returns x / y, which works the same way.

> def divide_two_numbers_fun (XQuery y):... Return x / y... > > divide_two_numbers_fun (7,8) 0.875

The main reason to avoid assigning lambda to variables is for debugging / maintenance purposes, especially in a production / team environment.

Let's look at a simple example of what might happen. In practice, things may become much more complicated.

> > divide_two_numbers (3,0) Traceback (most recent call last): File ", line 1, in File", line 1, in ZeroDivisionError: division by zero > divide_two_numbers_fun (3,0) Traceback (most recent call last): File ", line 1, in File", line 1, in divide_two_numbers_fun ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

As you can see above, through the declaration of regular functions, we know exactly which function caused the error. By contrast, using lambda can only tell us that there is a lambda causing the error.

Why is the feature name not displayed?

This is because lambda is an anonymous function, and all these functions have the same name -. Can you imagine how frustrating it would be if your colleagues found dozens of errors?

Good practice 2: use regular functions instead of lambda multiple times.

3. Improper use of higher-order functions

When we talk about high-order functions, we mean functions that can operate on other functions either by taking functions as arguments or by returning functions.

The functions related to the current topic are map (), filter (), and reduce (), which have been used more or less in many tutorials in lambda. However, this leads to some abuse of lambda and higher-order functions.

For demonstration purposes, I will only use the map () function in this tutorial, but the same principle applies to other higher-order functions.

Suppose we have a list of integers and want to have a list containing their squares. Lambda is used in conjunction with the map () function.

We will take a map object in the map () function, an iterator, and convert it to a list, on which we need to call the list () function.

> numbers = [1,2,3,5,8] > > squares = list (map (lambda x: X * x, numbers)) > squares [1,4,9,25,64]

In fact, the same function can be easily achieved through list understanding-without the need for higher-order functions or lambda. It's easier to read, isn't it?

Of course, mastering list comprehension is another "Pythonic feature" topic that requires another tutorial.

> numbers = [1,2,3,5,8] > > squares = [x * x for x in numbers] > squares [1,4,9,25,64]

Good practice 3: consider replacing higher-order functions with lambda with list derivation.

4. The expression is too clumsy

This is less common than the previous method. But some programmers just try to write the most Python code using lambda as much as possible. Sometimes there is a price to pay-readability.

Suppose we have a list of strings, and we need to sort them with a strange requirement: the number of different vowels in the word. Using lambda in the sorted () function is shown below.

> texts = ['iiiii',' bag', 'beto',' blackboard', 'sequoia'] > sorted (texts, key=lambda x: len (set ([l for l in list (x) if l in []) [' iiiii', 'bag',' beto', 'blackboard',' sequoia'])

It works as expected, but it's definitely not the easiest code to read. How about the following code?

> texts = ['iiiii',' bag', 'beto',' blackboard', 'sequoia'] > def number_distinct_vowels (x):. Vowels = ['await,' estranged, 'ified,' oiled,'u']... Vowels_only = [l for l in list (x) if l in vowels]... Distinct_vowels = set (all_vowels)... Return len (distinct_vowels)... > > sorted (texts, key=number_distinct_vowels) ['iiiii',' bag', 'beto',' blackboard', 'sequoia']

Of course, we need to write a few more lines of code, but isn't the new code more readable?

Good practice 4: if the expression of lambda is too cumbersome, write a regular function.

The above is all the contents of the article "what are the mistakes of Lambda in Python". Thank you for reading! Hope to share the content to help you, more related knowledge, welcome to follow the industry information channel!

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.