Shulou(Shulou.com)06/02 Report--

This article shows you what web design is. It is concise and easy to understand. It will definitely make your eyes shine. I hope you can learn something from the detailed introduction of this article.

We can make better designs by understanding our media. Later in this culture, however, many people didn't understand what web design was. Among them, we can find many famous business and cultural leaders, including a small number of senior designers-unless his design involves the web.

Some people who don't understand web design are still creating websites or managing web designers and developers. Other people who don't understand web design still represent the assessment of people other than us "professionally" accusing us. These people at least know to make more noise, they blame, they slam doors, and they throw money at the wrong people and things.

If we want a better location, a better job, a more informed user, we have to educate ourselves. Prefer real estate to architecture.

If you don't know what web is, it's hard to know what web design is. When asked to explain, those who fail to get to the point, or force the business reasons they know, emphasize the glory of barnumesque.

The news media also often misunderstand. Too much Internet news is profit-oriented and rarely covers real art and ideas. What drives editors, forced by publishers to worry, are advertisers, and even journalists who understand the web, who spend most of their time writing about deals and bidders. A lot of people are doing this, and even their statements are so obviously selfish and ridiculous that it's like Zuckerberg's Law (http://valleywag.com/tech/valleyspeak/zuckerbergs-law-once-every-hundred-years-media-changes-320289.php).

It's not that Zuckerberg's isn't news; it's not that journalists shouldn't write about it. But focusing on business and ignoring everything else is like reporting on real estate and ignoring architecture.

Equally tiresome is the one-sided message they tell us: In 1994, the Internet was incredible, fanatical. In 1999, the Internet was king. In 2001, the Internet bubble collapsed. In 2002, folk journalism discovered blogs. In 2004, CNN's guest blogger analyzed how civilian journalists were reshaping journalism and democracy to determine who won that year's presidential election. I forgot how it happened.

When absurd prophecies die absurdly, no one in the newsroom resigns, they just put a new thread into the water-just as salesmen change their slogan. After decades of commercializing news, there are still so many good broadcasters out there, but few who dare speak the truth to the public. Sometimes you can even hear a squeal and a hoot underneath him. ... the endless cycle of self-interest.

The news media isn't the only one making mistakes. Professional associations make mistakes every day, and they celebrate their mistakes once a year. Every year, advertising and design magazines and professional organizations hold a competition for "new media design," judged by last year's winners. What they call "new media design" tells us everything (design trends) without binding them (winners).

With some exceptions, the vast majority of winners will use the web as a vehicle for passive user acceptance of Flash and video content advertising and marketing competition. For active users, this is a game. But for you and me, active web apps may be limited to clicking the "Digg this page" button.

Screenshots of the winning sites are fabulous listed in glossy design yearbooks. When winners become deciders, they reward websites similar to their own designs. So websites behave like television, and what is considered good will be produced over and over again, and this generation of users and art executives will think that this way is a big cake of web design. Design critics are wrong.

People who thrive on print don't necessarily show their intelligence on the web. Their critical talents, fully developed in the kerning struggle, dismiss our professional difficulties as nothing.

Those unsophisticated folks lament the ugly fonts we use. They wonder aloud how we can enjoy a domain where we don't have absolute control over every visual element. They'll secretly wonder if we're really designers. They suspect we're not. These are beginners, design students or future critics. The main interest in their views is their professors and hope they have one.

Veteran critics understand that the web is not a printed matter and that the limitations of various designs vary. Yet these theorists occasionally succumb to unreasonable comparisons. I used to be like that, though a long time ago, strictly funny. These critics cry: Where are the masterpieces of web design? Google Maps may be like Leonardo's Mona Lisa for our age. The same brilliance in different fields. That's an answer that most of us would be happy with, but it's not an answer that would satisfy design critics looking for parallel domains. Whoo! I don't know, let's just say the Glaser icon and Bob Dylan poster... Print, Architecture and Web Design

Here's the problem: web design, while using graphic design and illustration principles, doesn't fit them perfectly. If you must compare the web to other media, print is a good choice. For web design, like a font, it is an environment for others to express. I'll tell you about the website design acquaintance Helvetica.

Architecture (the kind that uses steel, glass and stone) is also a more relevant analogy-or at least, more relevant than poster design. Architects construct designs and diagrams to facilitate dynamic behavior, and after design, the architect relinquishes control. Over time, the people who use the building began to speak and subjectively add meaning to the architect's design. (hindsight)

Of course, all contrasts are born rough. What is "London Calling" on TV? Who is Jane Austen of Car Design? Madame Butterfly isn't beautiful because she doesn't have a car chase, and peanut butter isn't delicious because she doesn't dance. So, what is web design?

Web design is not book design, it is not poster design, it is not illustration, and the crowning achievement of these disciplines is not what web design is about. Although websites can carry systems for games or videos, and those systems look interesting, these sites are examples of game design or video storytelling, not web design. So, what is web design?

Web design is a creation built to promote and encourage human behavior in a digital environment that reflects or adapts to the expression and satisfaction of individuals, and always maintains their own identity and changes peacefully over time.

Let us repeat it with emphasis:

Web design is a creation built to promote and encourage human behavior in a digital environment that reflects or adapts to the expression and satisfaction of individuals, and always maintains their own identity and changes peacefully over time. She's getting more beautiful.

Great web design is like great typography: some, like "Rosewood," impose personality on whatever content they apply. Others, like "Helvetica," gradually blend into the background (or try to), magically supporting all content regardless of their condition. (We can discuss whether Helvetica is really like neutral water in the future.)

What kind of web design looks like this? (Helvetica) Douglas Bowman's white "Minima" blog layout, for example, is used by millions of authors-and it feels like their personalized design. That's great design.

Great Web design is like great architecture. All office buildings, however unusual, have halls, bathrooms, stairs. The same goes for websites, which need some common features.

Although a great site design is completely personalized, it still has a lot of features like any other site. The layout of great magazines and newspapers also obeys this law, even if it differs from the layout of old magazines and newspapers in hundreds of details. Few praise great magazine layouts, but millions accept them consciously or unconsciously, and no one is sad that they are not posters.

The inexperienced or thoughtless designers complain that too many sites are gridded, too many sites are columns, and too many sites are boxy. They have struggled since 1995 to avoid boxiness, and when they have occasional successes, they tend to be aesthetically pleasing but rather tragic in usability.

Experienced web designers, like the brilliant newspaper art editor, agree that many of her projects have header, column and footer sections. Her job is not to present popular and complain, but to use these popular layouts to create distinctive, natural, thematically appropriate, refined and memorable, quiet and clearly moving pages.

If she achieves all these details, her work will be beautiful. Not everyone appreciates this beauty, because not everyone understands web design. Then, let's stop crying about web design and turn to those who don't see this beauty.

What is web design, and have you learned any knowledge or skills? If you want to learn more skills or enrich your knowledge reserves, please pay attention to the industry information channel.

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.