Shulou(Shulou.com)06/01 Report--

This article mainly explains "which one is easier to use, debian or ubuntu". The content in the article is simple and clear, and it is easy to learn and understand. Please follow the editor's train of thought to study and learn which one is easier to use, debian or ubuntu.

Long before the advent of Ubuntu, Debian was already a major force in the field of Linux. More specifically, it is Debian, the Linux release, that makes many other distributions from Knoppix to Simply Mepis a reality. This is like the relationship between Ubuntu and Linux Mint: Ubuntu provides a foundation for Mint to facilitate development.

Ubuntu

Ubuntu (YouPantu, Ubantu) is an open source GNU/Linux operating system based on desktop applications. Ubuntu is based on Debian GNU/Linux, supports x86, amd64 (x64) and ppc architecture, and is built by a global professional development team (Canonical Ltd).

Its name comes from the word "ubuntu" in Zulu or Hausa in southern Africa, similar to the Confucian idea of "benevolence", meaning "human nature" and "I exist because of everyone". It is a traditional African value.

Ubuntu is based on the Debian distribution and the GNOME desktop environment, while since version 11.04, the Ubuntu release has abandoned the Gnome desktop environment for Unity, unlike Debian in that it releases a new version every six months. The goal of Ubuntu is to provide the average user with an up-to-date and fairly stable operating system built mainly from free software. Ubuntu has a huge community power, and users can easily get help from the community. Ubuntu has made a great contribution to the popularity of GNU/Linux, especially the popularity of desktops, thus enabling more people to share the achievements and highlights of open source.

On January 3, 2013, Ubuntu officially released its mobile operating system for smartphones.

Ubuntu's free and open source desktop PC operating system based on linux fits well with Intel's ultrabook positioning and supports x86, 64-bit and ppc architectures.

Canonical held a Ubuntu smartphone conference at Crowne Plaza Zhongguancun, Beijing on February 20, 2014, and officially announced that Ubuntu partnered with domestic phone manufacturer Meizu to launch a Ubuntu version of MX3. Li Nan, vice president of Meizu, was present.

Debian

In a broad sense, Debian refers to a cooperative organization and its works dedicated to creating a free operating system. Because many kernel branches of the Debian project are dominated by the Linux macro kernel, and most of the basic tools in the operating system created by Debian developers come from the GNU project, "Debian" often refers to Debian GNU/Linux.

Unofficial kernel branches include Debian GNU/Hurd (Hurd microkernel), which only supports x86, and Dyson (OpenSolaris hybrid kernel), which only supports amd64. These unofficial branches have some serious problems, such as the technical immaturity of the Hurd microkernel and the imperfect basic functions of Dyson.

"Debian" is officially pronounced as "Debian", which is an international collaborative project, and there is no official designation of any non-English names.

Which is better, debian or ubuntu?

Distribution installation

Although Ubuntu is based on Debian, it doesn't bring exactly the same installation experience. For example, Debian allows you to try KDE, GNOME, and other desktop environments, while Ubuntu itself actually provides a Unity desktop environment. Admittedly, there are some Ubuntu derivatives on the market that offer alternative desktops, but Debian officially offers alternative desktops in the name of Debian. This is what Ubuntu lacks.

Another aspect worth mentioning is the way Debian is installed. You have two choices: either use the standard installation ISO file or use the Live ISO file bundled with the installer. I used the Live ISO file to see how the installer on this version handles installation. To my surprise, following the graphical user interface (GUI) installer step by step is not only very simple, but Debian even suggested that I consider establishing a dedicated primary partition. Considering that Ubuntu is still one of the few distributions that do not give such advice, this feature of Debian is very good.

Ubuntu also provides an excellent GUI installer; however, I find the lack of advice to create a dedicated primary partition frustrating because it will only benefit users in the long run. I'm sure there's some mysterious reason why Ubuntu developers are forcing users to choose this option manually, but I'm annoyed by the lack of this simple radio button.

Another aspect to consider is that the Debian installation process raises questions that novice users may not understand. For example, the question of where to install the package image and GRUP is best left to intermediate and advanced users. This is not to say that novice users don't understand such problems, but that most people don't want to study them hard in order to figure out what these things mean.

Another aspect that distinguishes Ubuntu from Debian is the visual effects that occur during installation. Debian's GUI installer lacks the various scrolling graphics that appear during the installation of Ubuntu. This is not to say that one side is better than the other in this respect; rather, it probably shows the impression that Debian gives the impression that this is an unadorned distribution.

Desktop experienc

Once installed, both Ubuntu and Debian provide a standard desktop environment that provides application menus, desktops, and a variety of applets. As far as Debian is concerned, I chose to use Gnome so that I ended up with a desktop of my own choice. In the case of Ubuntu, the desktop you end up with will be Unity.

Ubuntu comes with Firefox, while Debian offers an unbranded Iceweasel browser. It is actually the same browser as Firefox, but it is not owned by the trademark brand of the Mozilla Foundation.

The Gnome desktop I chose came with a standard Gnome experience. Because I ran the desktop in a virtual machine, I ended up with a fast backup mode because performance was limited on my test machine. Frankly, Debian with Gnome outperforms Ubuntu in terms of performance when running on machines with fewer resources. But in terms of appearance, Ubuntu has made a comeback in terms of beauty.

Both distributions use PulseAudio as their sound server after default installation, which is surprising because most Debian users are unlikely to want to use PulseAudio, because it is considered by many Linux users to be a bloated technology.

Software management

One of the things that Debian and Ubuntu have in common is the use of the Debian package to manage and the tools that come with it. At the terminal level, apt is used for package management.

GUI package management is starting to change: Ubuntu uses Ubuntu Software Center (Ubuntu Software Center, https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/) by default, while Debian uses Synaptic. For experienced Linux enthusiasts, the latter is actually more popular because Synaptic is a better software tool than a software center. However, novice users may find themselves missing the Ubuntu Software Center because Synaptic lacks the perfection of Ubuntu's default options.

On the other hand are Ubuntu's PPA, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas and Debian's backports (http://backports.debian.org/). The idea of Ubuntu's PPA is that you can make sure that every software you choose is up-to-date. As for Debian, users can use Debian backports to get the same experience. These software are basically tested by Debian and developed for users of Debian stable Edition. As for Ubuntu and Debian, users should be careful, because advanced software may sometimes bring new problems. My advice is that both methods are best avoided unless there is a revised version, or if you use an advanced version of any piece of software, you can get a feature. Although older software may seem a bit boring, they tend to be more stable.

Other miscellaneous

Another difference between Ubuntu and Debian is that most network devices in Ubuntu work by default. In case a proprietary driver is needed, the restricted driver management tool will easily deal with this problem. By contrast, Debian cannot run many wireless devices by default. Admittedly, there are the required binary large object files (blob) in the Debian component library; however, installing these files and allowing many commonly used wireless chipsets to work with Debian still requires hard-working end users.

Some people may think that Debian is more difficult to use. I don't agree with this, but I would think that Debian is a Linux that doesn't provide seat belts. To get a Ubuntu-like experience in a Debian environment, you just need to spend some time on the Debian http://wiki.debian.org/ and add one or two additional component libraries. In the end, you get a stable, responsive desktop that dwarfs any installed Ubuntu in terms of speed and stability. The secret to enjoying this benefit is that Debian only takes you a little time.

The final example of the superiority of Debian is the installation of proprietary video drivers. In the eyes of experienced users, the Debian method is fairly simple and straightforward. Just browse to the appropriate page, add the required package, and then paste the installation command for the driver you need. However, Ubuntu users have been overspoiled by proprietary driver managers. The really good news is that, in fact, the Debian method is much faster than the Ubuntu method. Debian users only need to copy and paste the contents of two command boxes from the Debian wiki. Ubuntu users, on the other hand, rely on GUI;. As we all know, GUI is far from perfect. To make matters worse, if something goes wrong, if you don't delve deeper into the log itself, there will be no detailed countermeasures for you to take.

The point here is that Debian needs a more hands-on user experience. Some people like this, while others hesitate to make desktop Linux a more in-depth experience.

So is Debian a strong Ubuntu replacement? The answer is yes, if you are willing to adjust your expectations.

There is no problem for some users who are willing to learn how Linux works and spend more time adding the required component libraries to get additional hardware support; for these people, Debian is a very good choice. Debian is easier to use than Arch Linux, but it still provides users with a fast and stable desktop that you can safely use for years to come.

Thank you for your reading, the above is the content of "which is easier to use, debian or ubuntu". After the study of this article, I believe you have a deeper understanding of which is better to use debian or ubuntu, and the specific use needs to be verified in practice. Here is, the editor will push for you more related knowledge points of the article, welcome to follow!

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.