Shulou(Shulou.com)06/03 Report--

Starting from the launch date of the Horae consensus Economic Community (Aug. 15, 2018), I will continue to write and publish a series of articles on the Horae consensus Economic Community Analysis:

(1) "Horae consensus Economic Community Decryption-income Analysis"

(2) "report on in-depth investigation and Comprehensive Analysis of Horae consensus Economic Community"

(3) "Horae consensus Economic Community declassification-risk Analysis"

(4) "declassification of Horae consensus Economic Community-- Vitality Analysis"

Like the previous writing style, this article is an original article (reprint please indicate the source), and will never contain any personal contact information, you can rest assured to share!

Before officially starting the analysis, let's convert the Chinese version of CAP on the official website.

Consensus Alliance Program (CAP)

Once registered, it becomes the Standard node type.

This node type cannot be used to calculate the number of active people, nor can it participate in the consensus alliance program.

However, the DAP and MINING profits of this node will not be affected in any way.

Consensus node

[Athena]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 500 USD

(2) team investment: 0

(3) number of active persons: 0

For Athena,income assets (income wallet), the weekly release limit is 500 USD.

$Investment incentive: 5%

$$profit reward: 5%

[Eunomia]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 3000 USD

(2) team investment: 100000 USD

(3) number of active persons: 30

The weekly release limit for Eunomia,income assets (income wallet) is 2000 USD.

$Investment reward: 5% | 3% | 1%

$$profit reward: 3% | 3% | 3%

[Dike]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 5000 USD

(2) team investment: 500000 USD

(3) number of active persons: 100

The weekly release limit for Dike,income assets (income wallet) is 3000 USD.

$Investment reward: 5% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 2%

$$profit reward: 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 3%

[Eirene]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 10000 USD

(2) team investment: 1000000 USD

(3) number of active persons: 300

The weekly release limit for Eirene,income assets (income wallet) is 5000 USD.

$Investment reward: 5% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3%

$profit reward: 3% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 4%

[Horae]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 30000 USD

(2) team investment: 3000000 USD

(3) number of active persons: 500

The weekly release limit for Horae,income assets (income wallet) is 10000 USD.

$$Investment incentive:

5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3%

$$profit reward:

3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3%

Release height

Once the Horae is reached, three release heights will be defined for members of that status.

All profits and rewards of the member follow the Horae node type.

[H1]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 50000 USD

(2) team investment: 5000000 USD

(3) number of active persons: 700

The weekly release limit for H 1 Magi income assets (income wallet) is 15000 USD.

[H2]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 50000 USD

(2) team investment: 7000000 USD

(3) number of active persons: 1000

For H2 income assets, the weekly release limit is 20000 USD.

[H3]

Reach a condition

(1) personal investment: 50000 USD

(2) team investment: 10000000 USD

(3) number of active persons: 1500

The weekly release limit for H3 Magic income assets (income wallet) is 30000 USD.

I have to admire that the designers of this system are well aware of human nature and the way of "equal wealth", and deduce the block chain spirit of "freedom" and "equality" to the extreme!

Below, we interpret how the CAP perfectly deduces the blockchain spirit of "freedom" and "equality" from three aspects.

First, put an end to the operation of multiple accounts

1. It is necessary to become a consensus node to participate in the consensus alliance plan, with a minimum investment of 500 500USD. This greatly avoids those who make up the number and "self-ranking". In other words, few people invest a lot of USDs themselves to increase the number of active people and promote the node type.

This basically ensures the authenticity and effectiveness of the active population and subsequent performance productivity.

2. As we all know, signing up for multiple accounts has become the biggest "worry" for many projects and many market leaders.

Once everyone signs up for multiple accounts, market leaders rarely get a bonus from the referral, let alone a penny from their team.

This is also a problem that more than 95% of the projects have not solved and cannot solve!

As far as I know, only some of the top business platforms in the industry have developed a relatively sound mechanism to prohibit multi-account operation.

However, when you learn more about Horae's control mechanism for multi-account registration, you will come to a conclusion:

For the management and control mechanism of multi-account registration, other platforms are very different from Horae and are not at the same level at all!

In the Horae business platform, signing up for multiple accounts is not only unnecessary, but even more impossible!

The Horae community has issued an announcement, which is detailed in "NOTICE (Prohibit multi-account registration)", which has strict restrictions on multiple accounts:

(1) An IP can only register one account.

(2) An IP can only log in to one account.

(3) A person can only register one account.

3. Eliminate multi-account registration through the setting of the incentive scheme

(1) there is only one generation reward for the original consensus node [Athena], so it is not necessary to register for multiple accounts!

(2) and the promotion of the consensus node needs three conditions to be reached at the same time, so it is impossible to register multiple accounts to get multiple awards!

2. Put an end to investment in large accounts

1. During the ICO period, the maximum amount of purchase for each account is 400000 HRC.

2. During the period of the consensus Alliance, the investment limit for each account is US $50,000.

3. Private equity funds and large capital institutions are not allowed to enter the market, and only retail investors are accepted to apply for purchase and investment.

Third, pursue "active people" and "team investment" rather than "individual investment" as the core economic elements of market development and community prosperity.

1. If nothing else, it can be seen from the definition of H1Magol H2Magi H3.

2. If we want to improve the "release height", "personal investment" is no longer helpful; we must constantly improve "team investment" and "active number".

Fourth, realize the "uniform" distribution of wealth

Horae's mission-- "to build the world's first free and equal consensus economic community"

This is definitely not a slogan!

It can be said that the consensus spirit of "freedom" and "equality" has been realized in pattern design, strategy formulation and mechanism operation.

This article mainly analyzes how Horae practices the consensus spirit of "freedom" and "equality" from the perspective of wealth distribution scheme (CAP).

It is no exaggeration to say that the CAP of the Horae consensus Economic Community is the most "even" wealth distribution plan I have ever seen.

If you look at more than 95% of the wealth distribution plans on the market, either let the people in front earn most (95%) of the wealth, or let the platform earn the vast majority (95%) of the wealth!

If you want to talk about a common phenomenon that exists on almost all platforms on the market, I can say:

"A very small number of people (about 5%) earn a very large part of their wealth (about 95%)!"

This is also the most fundamental and core reason why most of the platforms on the market cannot operate healthily for more than two years or for long-term development.

Why is the incentive scheme the most "even" wealth distribution scheme in history?

First of all, I need to make it clear that when I say "uniform", it is in a relative sense, not in an absolute sense!

In this world, there is no "freedom" in the absolute sense, nor "equality" in the absolute sense, let alone "uniformity" in the absolute sense.

To be able to achieve "freedom", "equality" and "uniformity" in a relative sense is not only not easy, but also rare or even unprecedented in the world!

Some people may be familiar with the above two sentences.

It has been nearly three years since I first said these two words in November 2015.

I have emphasized these two sentences at least ten times in public.

Countless platforms have been confirmed, are confirming these two words.

Secondly, we interpret "uniformity" through the following arguments, and demonstrate it with the corresponding data analysis.

Argument 1: the wealth earned is released "evenly" through a certain period (weekly)

In order for "most people to earn most of their wealth", it is extremely important that the entry funds of the account be effectively controlled:

Every income you earn in HORAE goes into income assets (income wallet), and different node types have different weekly releases.

Only the funds released can be used normally.

In this way, time is used to dilute the speed at which each person earns wealth, and to achieve "uniformity" in the speed at which wealth is earned.

Argument 2: the total income of "investment reward" of different node types can be increased uniformly.

Let's calculate a set of data:

[Athena] Total income of investment incentives: 5%

[Eunomia] Total income of investment incentives: 5% + 3% + 1% = 9%

[Dike] Total income of investment incentives: 5% + 3% + 1% + 2% + 2% = 13%

[Eirene] Total income of investment incentives: 5% + 3% + 3% + 3% = 17%

[Horae] Total income of investment incentives: 5% + 3% + 2% + 2% + 3% + 3% = 21%

As a result, it can be seen that: for different types of nodes, the proportion of total investment incentive income increases by the same rate: all 4%.

To ensure that the node income "uniform" increase, will not let the income difference between different nodes is particularly large!

Argument 3: the proportion of each algebraic reward (investment reward) is "evenly" distributed

Let's look at a set of data:

[Athena] Investment reward: 5%

[Eunomia] Investment reward: 5-3-1% = 9%

[Dike] Investment reward: 5%-3%-1%-2%-2% = 13%

[Eirene] Investment reward: 5%-3%-3%-3% = 17%

[Horae] Investment reward: 5%-3%-2%-2%-3%-3% = 21%

If you have more than three years of marketing experience in developing and leading the team, you will certainly agree with the following two points:

(1) for the same market allocation ratio, the more uniform the distribution of each algebraic reward ratio is (the smaller the difference between them), then for more than 95% of the people, the more income he gets!

For example, let's also take a total of 17% of five generations as an example:

Plan A: 5%-4%-3%-3%-2%

Plan B ([Dike] Investment incentive): 5-3-3-3-3-3-3

Because, in which generation your market has the widest width (the largest number of people), you can't predict; only by evenly distributing the proportion of rewards can you get the most awards in the end!

Also 17% of the total reward income, in the end, Plan B you get the most bonus!

When we analyze the above data, we can see:

No matter which type of node, the progressive gap between each algebraic reward ratio is very small (the gap is only 1%-2%), which ensures the "uniform" distribution of algebraic awards!

For example: [Horae] the progressive gap between the reward ratios of each generation is:

2% (progressive gap between first and second generation)

0% (progressive gap between second and third generations)

1% (progressive gap between third and fourth generations)

0% (progressive gap between fourth and fifth generations)

1% (progressive gap between fifth and sixth generations)

0% (progressive gap between sixth and seventh generations)

(2) the later algebra reward should not be too low, if it is too low, because the number of algebra behind may be the largest, and it will not be too much relative to you.

If you want to increase the reward, it is best to increase the proportion of algebraic reward later!

This is best demonstrated in the CAP of the Horae consensus Economic Community:

[Eunomia] increases by 4% relative to [Athena], and the previous algebra bonus remains unchanged, directly extending 2 generations: 3%-1%.

[Dike] increases by 4% relative to [Eunomia], the bonus of the previous two generations remains unchanged, and directly extends the second generation: 2-2%.

[Eirene] increases by 4% relative to [Dike], with bonuses unchanged in the first two generations, 1% in each generation (to 3-3%) in the last 2 generations, and 2% in the middle generation.

[Horae] increases 4% relative to [Eirene], the bonus of the previous three generations remains unchanged, and directly extends the second generation: 3%-3%, and the middle generation decreases by 1%, to 2%-2%.

Argument 4: the proportion of each algebraic reward (profit reward) is "evenly" distributed

Let's look at another set of data:

[Athena]

$Investment incentive: 5%

$$profit reward: 5%

[Eunomia]

$Investment reward: 5% | 3% | 1%

$$profit reward: 3% | 3% | 3%

[Dike]

$Investment reward: 5% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 2%

$$profit reward: 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 3%

[Eirene]

$Investment reward: 5% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3%

$profit reward: 3% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 4%

[Horae]

$$Investment incentive:

5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3%

$$profit reward:

3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3%

Through the analysis of the above data, we can get the following set of data:

[Athena]

Total $investment awards: 5%

Total $$profit reward: 5%

[Eunomia]

Total $$Investment Award: 9%

Total $$profit reward: 9%

[Dike]

Total $$Investment Award: 13%

Total $$profit rewards: 13%

[Eirene]

Total $$Investment Award: 17%

Total $$profit rewards: 17%

[Horae]

Total $$Investment incentives: 21%

Total $$profit rewards: 21%

No matter for any node, the total proportion of profit reward is equal to that of investment reward.

More importantly, on the basis of investment incentives, profit rewards are "evenly" distributed to each algebraic reward, so that the reward proportion of each generation is basically the same or the difference is very small!

Here are two examples:

[Horae] profit reward:

3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3%

-- basically the same

[Eirene] profit reward:

3% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 4%

-- the difference is very small

Once again, the "uniform" distribution of algebraic awards has reached the extreme!

Remember: the more uniform you are, the richer you are!

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.