Shulou(Shulou.com)06/03 Report--

Put into the desktop software testing for a year, there seems to be a lot to say, but feel speechless.

Preemptive technology

The testing methods of desktop software can almost cover most of the functions with boundary values and process analysis methods, and then use some exploratory testing methods to find out the bug of some animated scenes (such as quick operation, etc.), use some destructive tests for testing the download process (you can also focus on performance here), and interact with the functions and hotkeys of the system itself, such as "Show Desktop" (win+d). For example, switching windows (alt+tab, switching in the taskbar), such as desktop settings images (solid colors and local pictures), etc., when the software is not mature, you can also click on a functional interface repeatedly (whether it is illogical or invalid or there is an undestructed phenomenon in the program).

Ridge tool

Desktop software, the framework is based on the system window to draw. For some animation failures, you can usually use spyxx to view the control properties and view the window location. Or some other control viewer.

There is also a general tool is logviewer, to develop colleagues in the program to give the information, output log location problems.

With regard to the BS/CS mode, the current Internet software is often a mixture of two types, with B-end embedded in C-end. Here, you can use network packet grabbing tools to locate or snoop on some problems. Individuals often have fiddler and httpanalyzer, but wireshark and other products do not need to be used in this kind of products.

Re-ridge product positioning

In fact, the desktop product road is very difficult, Microsoft is already such a big desktop, so in the public, the new desktop is impossible to replace into a pseudo-operating system. But it is impossible to share such a big cake.

Pay attention to the minority, the Internet has been well developed, children and the elderly are indeed "vulnerable groups" in the Internet. I think we can do something "platform" here and provide one-stop service to this kind of users. Like the supermarket, everything you need is put on it, and it is clear at a glance that it can be done as long as the user moves the mouse twice.

Taking into account the public, personal access to computers is in the fifth grade of primary school, from DOS to Windows, from StarCraft to now, mainstream people have already had their own computer habits, so I still think that the characteristics of "customization" have a market and word of mouth. The "customization" here means "personalization". The real plug-in of the functions on the desktop software is not put into a package, but compressed into the background to provide users with functions that can be expanded. Users who like dazzling download those dazzling things, and those who like business use serious things that are convenient for office work.

So what should be universal? What I prefer is SNS. Today's SNS has been integrated into all aspects, and what is provided on the desktop is still an one-stop shop, still a platform, integrating various major categories, such as advertising, blog, Weibo, chat and making friends, websites and other large types, conceptual things.

In fact, the market is very difficult to do, and the water is indeed deep, but to dabble in it will inevitably have something to do with analytical positioning, market input, and user habits.

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.